The Synergy of Military and Civil Society in High-Value Timber Production: Developing Forest Institutions Above the Ruins of Conflict

Bayu Mitra A. Kusuma

Abstract

Maluku is a province in eastern Indonesia that has experienced prolonged conflict due to racial and sectarian issues. This conflict can be resolved when the state through the military changes its approach from security to prosperity. With the synergy of the military and civil society as the basic foundation of the Green Gold program, Maluku has transformed into a producer of high-value timber such as agarwood (Aquilaria Malaccensis) and sandalwood (Santalum Album) from their production forests. This research aims to analyze the institutional governance of production forests in Maluku using the Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework as an analytical tool. To analyze the above phenomenon, this research used a descriptive qualitative approach with data collected from interviews and literature studies. The research results showed that: First, in terms of Attributes of the Resource, it was found that basically local users have managed the production forest resources quite well, but they still have a high dependence on military assistance. Second, in terms of Attributes of the Users, it was found that the community has a high sense of belonging to the forest. There is an assumption that if they do not manage the forest well, it will be difficult for them to escape from conflict. Therefore, in order to realize community self-government over the forest, the military gradually reduced its role.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Bertrand, J. (2002). Legacies of the authoritarian past: Religious violence in Indonesia's Moluccan islands. Pacific Affairs, 75(1): 57-85. https://doi.org/10.2307/4127241.

Brinkmann, S. & Kvale, S. (2018). Doing interviews. Second edition. London: SAGE Publications. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781529716665.

Ernas, S. (2012). Policy of social conflict resolution: Implementation of the Malino agreement in Maluku province, Indonesia. Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan, 3(2): 316-344. https://doi.org/10.18196/jgp.2012.0017.

Fitriati, R., Gunawan, B., Nulhaqim, S. A., & Irfan, M. (2019). Merawat perdamaian: 20 tahun konflik Maluku [Caring for peace: 20 years of the Maluku conflict]. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama – M&C.

Frank, D. (2021). From prominent 17th century colonial Dutch settlements to modern Indonesian urban centers. Journal of East Asian Urban History, 3(1): 121-138, https://doi.org/10.22769/JEUH.2021.3.1.121.

Gibson, C. C., McKean, M. A., & Ostrom, E. (2000). People and forest: Communities, institutions, and governance. Cambridge and London: MIT Press.

Haugen, H. M. (2014). Peoples’ right to self-determination and self-governance over natural resources: Possible and desirable? Etikk I Praksis – Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics, 8(1): 3-21. https://doi.org/10.5324/eip.v8i1.1800.

Lalhakim, M. H. (2016). Dampak konflik Maluku terhadap ketahanan wilayah: Studi kasus di kota Ambon [The impact of the Maluku conflict on regional resilience: A case study in Ambon city]. Master thesis. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Mattor, K. M. & Cheng, A. S. (2015). Contextual factors influencing collaboration levels and outcomes in national forest stewardship contracting. Review of Policy Research, 32(6): 723-744. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12151.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2019). Qualitative data analysis: A method sourcebook. Fourth edition. London: SAGE Publications.

Mogende, E. & Kolawole, O. D. (2016). Dynamics of local governance in natural resource conservation in the Okavango delta, Botswana. Natural Resources Forum, 40(3): 93-102. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.12098.

Monardo, D. (2021). Model tata kelola sumber daya alam dan lingkungan [Natural resource and environmental governance model]. Honorary doctorate inauguration speech. Bogor: IPB University.

Ostrom, E. (2011). Background on the institutional analysis and development framework. Policy Studies Journal, 39(1): 7-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00394.x.

Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.

Raditya, B., Wahyudi, B., & Simatupang, H. (2019). Implementasi kebijakan Kodam xvi dalam pencegahan potensi konflik di wilayah Maluku tahun 2015 s.d. 2107 [Implementation of the policy of Kodam xvi in preventing potential conflicts in the Maluku region from 2015 to 2107]. Jurnal Strategi Perang Semesta, 5(1): 1-18.

Ricklefs, M. C. (2008). A history of modern Indonesia since c. 1200. Fourth edition. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Schulze, K. E. (2017). The ethnic in Indonesia’s communal conflicts. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 40(12): 2096-2114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2017.1277030.

Sithole, G. (2020). Access to and utilisation of forest resources: Evidence from common property forest management in Swaziland. International Journal of Agricultural Science, 10(1): 1-17.

Sudjatmiko, I. G. (2008). Communal conflict, state failure, and peacebuilding: The case of Ambon. Caforio, G. et al. (Eds.). Armed forces and conflict resolution: Sociological perspectives. Bingley: Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1572-8323(08)07019-7.

Tremblay, S. et al. (2021). Conducting qualitative research to respond to Covid-19 challenges: Reflections for the present and beyond. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211009679.

Wang, H. J. & Thongma, W. (2014). Resident’s recognition of forest resource and user’s attributes: Influence of participation modes in resource management. Asia-Pacific Journal of EU Studies, 12(2): 81-99.

Yatim, H. et al. (2020). Institutional analysis for governance administration community forests that support sustainable forest management. International Journal of Scientific Development and Research, 5(11): 58-64.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.25077/ijasc.6.2.57-63.2022

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.